British Analyst Criticizes Western Media Bias Favoring Pakistan in Operation Sindoor Coverage

British Analyst Criticizes Western Media Bias Favoring Pakistan in Operation Sindoor Coverage
British political commentator and author David Vance

A prominent British political commentator has sharply criticized Western media outlets for their biased portrayal of Operation Sindoor, India’s recent military response to cross-border terrorism. David Vance, in an interview with ANI, described the coverage as “absolutely atrocious and skewed in favor of Pakistan,” accusing it of overlooking India’s security concerns. The operation, launched on May 7, targeted terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan following the deadly Pahalgam attack on April 22, which claimed 26 lives.

Vance argued that the military action was a necessary and effective measure, stating, “The operation was long overdue and it needed to happen. It has been pretty successful as far as I can tell.” He framed India’s strikes as a stand against a broader threat, calling Pakistan a “failed state, a terrorist state, and a terrorist incubator.” His comments highlight a growing sentiment that India’s response was a justified assertion of its sovereignty.

The controversy intensified with reports from The Washington Post, which cited satellite imagery suggesting Indian strikes damaged six Pakistani airfields, including hangars, runways, and military buildings. This narrative has fueled debate, with Vance and others questioning why Western media appear to downplay India’s perspective while amplifying Pakistan’s claims. India maintains that the operation was precise, targeting only terrorist sites, and avoided civilian or military infrastructure.

The operation has drawn varied global reactions. While some Western analysts have expressed concern over escalation, others, including Vance, see it as a legitimate defense against state-sponsored terrorism. The ongoing tension along the India-Pakistan border continues to shape international discourse, with both nations reinforcing their positions amid heightened military activity.

Local voices in Kashmir have mixed reactions, with some praising the operation’s swift execution, while others worry about potential reprisals. As the situation unfolds, the critique of Western media bias adds another layer to the complex geopolitical dynamics in the region.

Read more