Would security forces have destroyed Taj Mahal like EDI, if two militants would have attacked it: Er Rasheed

Asks administration to answer why were locals in Nowgam asked to prepare graves but nobody was buried in them

Srinagar: Asking Indian State , Media and mainstream politicians to stop seeking political dividends from every tragic incident , AIP Supremo and MLA Langate Er Rasheed has said that all these warriors of Kashmiris should answer that had militants attacked Taj Mahal, would they have destroyed it same way, as they did to EDI Institute.

In a Statement Er Rasheed said “If Indian parliament could be saved from getting damaged in the militant attack, security agencies could have shown restrain and dealt with two alleged militants in a manner that could have caused minimum damage to the building.  A common Kashmiri gets hurt when he has to listen sermons about significance of EDI and education as if he has chosen to live in a stone age.  If militants would have entered Taj Mahal or any other prestigious institution, the security forces would have not only shown utmost restraint but would have made it sure that the building and other infrastructures receives minimum damage. But in a desperate attempt to strengthen India’s view point , security forces very often destroy the buildings and assets with an objective that it would create bad will about militants”. Er Rashid also asked police administration to tell people in Nowgam Langate that why their religious sentiments were hurt, as they were asked to prepare four graves for deceased militants but later the militants were buried in a forest. He said that once someone dies or looses his life, who so ever he may be , the whole animosity ends, but not allowing funeral of these slain militants and leaving graves without burying bodies in them is an act that deserves condemnation.